Introduction
I would just give her a cup of coffee. When I had rice, atol, I would give it, but when I don’t have it, I can’t. When I don’t have a way to give it, I don’t give it. I don’t have a way to give it, as much as my heart would like to, but I just don’t have a way.
Sitting on a broken plastic stool in the heat of her parents’ one-room house, Flora explained how difficult it was to provide for her daughter, Marisa, throughout her infancy. Flora’s eyes were infused with the intensity of her memories—of how thin Marisa became, how her stomach swelled up and all her ribs became visible, and how everyone feared she would die. Yet she described her helplessness to feed and cure Marisa with calm; Flora, like many of Guatemala’s rural poor, is long accustomed to the daily struggles of hunger and sickness.
Flora is twenty years old. She feels that her life has improved since her childhood, when her family was far worse off than they are now. She recalls how the dirt floors used to turn to pure mud when the house would flood during the rainy season; how so often, she ate nothing but tortillas with salt and drank bitter coffee since her parents could not afford sugar; how she used to feel her heart flutter with exhaustion every time she walked, but nevertheless went to work as a maid at the young age of fourteen to help feed the family. At least now, she says, they have a cement floor. At least now, they sometimes have more food than just tortillas. At least now, she receives free vitamins through a foreign health project and no longer feels tired throughout the day.
Even though Flora feels that she is better off today than she was twenty years ago, she and her husband Ramon rarely have enough food for themselves and their two children—Marisa, now two years old, and Angelica, a baby of eight months. Ramon, who has worked in cattle ranching, meat sales, and construction, rarely finds more than a temporary job, which draws him away from home for one or two weeks. Upon his return, he gives Flora gastos, a portion of his salary he allots for her to buy the family’s food supply. The amount is variable, depending on how much Ramon is paid, how much debt he accumulates from food and lodging at his worksite, and whether he lapses into alcoholism and spends his salary at bars. Flora must spend the money wisely in the Sunday market, using every centavo to its maximum potential.
Flora and Ramon, too poor to afford their own house, used to live in a rented room with Ramon’s two parents, seven siblings, and eight nieces and nephews. Cramped, crowded, and suffering to help bring enough food to the table for all, the couple eventually moved to Flora’s parents’ house, where there were fewer people—ten in total, as opposed to nineteen. There, they have a little bit more space and a better chance of having enough to eat. When Ramon does not have work, Flora’s parents provide the food for both families. When Flora’s father does not have work, she stretches her gastos to feed her parents and younger siblings in addition to her own nuclear family of four. More often than not, both Ramon and Flora’s father are unemployed, and the family eats the cheapest meals possible: tortillas with salt and coffee with sugar.
For a woman like Flora, it is almost impossible to follow the common biomedical recommendation that mothers introduce solid foods into infants’ diets at six months of age2. At this point, breast milk is no longer a sufficient source of nourishment for infants, who require early complementary foods for proper growth and nutrition3. But Flora has inconsistent access to food, and her opportunities to obtain more food are few and far between. She has already taken one step--the move to her parents’ house--to guarantee more food per family member. However, finding more money for food is impossible. Flora, who cannot work because she has two young children to care for, is economically dependent on Ramon. Ramon snatches any chance to work, but those chances come with unjustly low wages and do not come often enough. Planting and growing the family’s food is also infeasible. Inequalities in land distribution, land loss, an increased gang presence in rural areas, and rampant thievery of crops prevent families from participating in subsistence agriculture even when they have money to buy seeds and plants.
Even if a doctor had told Flora to give Marisa early complementary foods when she was six months old, Flora would not have been able to do so. Ramon did not have enough work to expand the family’s food budget. Rather than dipping into the family’s limited food supply to feed Marisa, it made more sense to Flora to give her daughter the most readily available calories: those of breast milk. She continued to exclusively breastfeed Marisa until she was eight months old, when Ramon found a job that provided Flora with gastos to buy and cook vegetables for her infant daughter. Soon thereafter, Marisa became sick with extensive diarrhea and her father entered a long period of unemployment. Flora could no longer offer Marisa anything but tortillas, salt, and coffee, aside from a diminishing supply of breast milk, due to another pregnancy and subsequent decision to wean Marisa from the breast. Without food or medicines for her diarrhea, Marisa’s health declined until she was severely malnourished4.
The nutritional guideline of offering the first nonmilk foods (beikost) at six months is offered from a context divorced from food insecurity and economic pressures. The conditions of Flora’s life complicate the idea of using such metrics and placing value upon certain behaviors as the “best” health practices without regard to their setting. It also complicates the use of health education, often an important measure in improving health outcomes, as a way to influence or change a patient’s behaviors. How can we hope that patients will adopt what we deem as biomedically-appropriate behaviors when our suggestions are economically infeasible?
By examining case studies such as Flora’s, this paper explores how economic pressures and gender inequalities significantly constrain poor mothers’ decisions to give infants early complementary foods in rural Guatemala. We argue that because of scarcity and food insecurities, these women are unable to follow biomedical recommendations of “best practices” regarding breastfeeding. They too often cannot begin to provide solid foods at six months, nor can they provide infants with consistent or diverse diets of solid foods. We suggest that health education with regard to the introduction of solid foods must be coupled with efforts that alleviate the financial burden of changing nutritional behaviors. As such, we offer recommendations about maintaining healthy infant growth. We also discuss the implications of applying metrics developed for economically secure, first-world communities to the marginalized poor, and reflect upon the idea of “best practices.”
